Real life. Real thoughts. The messy middle of motherhood, mental health, and figuring it out. The space between staying and leaving, between healing and hurting.
Do You Reach Out… or Let It Stay Broken?
When months go by without speaking, the hardest part isn’t the silence—it’s deciding whether to break it. If you’re struggling with whether to reach out to an estranged sibling, you’re not alone.
6 min read


Months go by without speaking, and the hardest part isn't the silence—it's deciding what to do with it.
Because silence doesn't actually stay silent.
It shows up everywhere. It appears when something funny happens and your first instinct is to grab your phone. It appears when a memory surfaces out of nowhere while you're driving. It appears during holidays, birthdays, random Tuesday afternoons, and those strange moments when life feels normal for half a second before reality reminds you otherwise.
That's when the question creeps back in.
Do I reach out?
It's a question I've asked myself more times than I'd like to admit.
Not just with my sister.
With friendships.
With family members.
With people I genuinely loved.
There are moments when I want to reach out. Moments where I convince myself enough time has passed. Maybe emotions have settled. Maybe things would be different now. Maybe we could have an honest conversation. Maybe there could be accountability. Maybe there could be understanding.
But almost immediately another question follows.
Why am I the one thinking about reaching out?
Why am I the one trying to soften something that wasn't handled softly in the first place?
Why am I carrying responsibility for fixing something that wasn't broken by one person alone?
And that's where things become uncomfortable.
Because the longer I sat with those questions, the more I realized this wasn't really about my sister.
It was about me.
It was about a pattern I've repeated for most of my life.
I've always been the fixer.
The peacemaker.
The one who sends the first text.
The one who checks in.
The one who smooths things over.
The one who apologizes first, sometimes before I've even figured out whether I actually did something wrong.
For years, I thought that role meant I was loving people well. I thought it meant I was mature. I thought it meant I valued relationships more than other people did.
Maybe sometimes that was true.
But eventually I had to ask myself a question that made me deeply uncomfortable.
If a relationship only survives because one person keeps repairing it, is it actually healthy?
That question sat with me longer than I wanted it to.
Because once I started looking back, I realized this wasn't a one-time thing.
I've played this role before.
Actually, I've played it a lot.
When friendships struggled, I fixed them.
When family relationships became strained, I fixed them.
When communication broke down, I fixed it.
When someone pulled away, I chased them.
When silence appeared, I filled it.
At some point, I stopped asking whether it was my responsibility and simply accepted that it was.
The problem with becoming the fixer is that eventually people start expecting you to fix everything. You become so reliable in that role that everyone assumes you'll eventually do what you've always done. You'll call. You'll text. You'll apologize. You'll smooth things over. You'll make it okay again.
And if you don't?
Everything stays broken.
At least that's what it feels like.
Therapists sometimes refer to this as overfunctioning. It's when one person consistently carries more emotional responsibility than everyone else in the relationship. They're the ones managing conflict, maintaining communication, initiating repair, checking in, and doing the emotional heavy lifting. Over time, the relationship begins to depend on their effort to survive.
And honestly?
That's exhausting.
Because healthy relationships aren't supposed to require one person to carry all the weight. Healthy relationships require effort from both sides. Accountability from both sides. Communication from both sides. Repair from both sides.
Relationships aren't supposed to survive because one person refuses to let them die.
Somewhere along the way, I realized I wasn't just missing people.
I was missing my role.
And that realization changed everything.
I wasn't uncomfortable because I wasn't reaching out.
I was uncomfortable because I wasn't doing what I had always done.
I wasn't fixing it.
For a long time, I mistook that discomfort for guilt.
I thought maybe the guilt meant I should send the text.
Maybe it meant I should be the bigger person.
Maybe it meant I should fix it one more time.
Now I think the discomfort came from breaking a pattern.
And breaking patterns rarely feels good in the beginning.
People talk about growth like it's empowering.
Sometimes it is.
Sometimes it feels like sitting on your hands while every instinct in your body is screaming at you to do what you've always done.
Growth can feel awkward.
Growth can feel selfish.
Growth can feel wrong even when it's healthy.
One of the biggest things therapy has taught me is that reconciliation and resolution are not the same thing.
For years, I thought they were.
I thought if a relationship wasn't repaired, then it wasn't resolved.
I thought peace required getting back on speaking terms.
I thought healing required both people sitting down and working things out.
Now I see it differently.
Reconciliation requires two people.
Resolution can happen within one.
That's an important distinction because not everyone is going to meet you halfway. Not everyone is going to have the conversation. Not everyone is going to apologize. Not everyone is going to acknowledge your experience.
And if your healing depends entirely on someone else's participation, you're giving them control over your peace.
That's not where I want to live anymore.
The truth is, reaching out would probably be easier.
At least temporarily.
It would give me something to do with the discomfort.
It would make me feel proactive.
It would make me feel hopeful.
It would give me the illusion of control.
But action and healing aren't always the same thing.
Sometimes we're not reaching out because we're ready for resolution.
Sometimes we're reaching out because we're uncomfortable with the silence.
That's an important difference.
Psychologists have found that uncertainty can be more distressing than a known negative outcome. In simple terms, our brains often prefer an answer we don't like over no answer at all. Uncertainty keeps us searching. It keeps us wondering. It keeps us mentally replaying scenarios and conversations.
That's why silence feels so heavy.
Silence leaves room for assumptions.
Questions.
What-ifs.
Stories we create in our own minds.
Silence makes us wonder whether the other person misses us.
Silence makes us wonder if they care.
Silence makes us wonder whether we should be doing something.
Anything.
Just to make the uncertainty stop.
But relief and resolution aren't the same thing either.
Sometimes we tell ourselves we want reconciliation when what we really want is relief from the discomfort.
I've had to ask myself some hard questions.
If I reached out today, what would I actually be hoping for?
Would I be looking for accountability?
Understanding?
Repair?
Or would I simply be trying to make myself feel better?
Because those are very different motivations.
The reality is that wanting someone back in your life doesn't automatically mean the relationship is healthy.
You can miss someone deeply and still recognize that nothing has changed.
You can love someone and still need boundaries.
You can want connection while understanding that connection requires effort from both people.
That's the part I think people struggle with most.
We assume missing someone means we should go back.
Sometimes missing someone simply means they mattered.
Nothing more.
Nothing less.
The older I get, the more I realize that some relationships aren't healed by trying harder.
Some relationships are healed by doing something completely different.
For me, that means sitting in the silence instead of immediately trying to fill it. It means allowing discomfort to exist without rushing to fix it. It means letting responsibility fall where it actually belongs instead of automatically picking it up.
Some days that's incredibly difficult.
Some days I still think about reaching out.
Some days I miss people in ways that catch me completely off guard.
Some days I wonder if I'm doing the right thing.
But then I remind myself of something important.
Growth doesn't always look like fixing things.
Sometimes growth looks like not fixing them.
Sometimes growth looks like stepping out of the role you've always played.
Sometimes growth looks like allowing someone else the opportunity to show up.
And sometimes growth looks like finally realizing that not every broken relationship is yours to repair.
Maybe you're reading this while staring at a text you've typed and deleted ten times.
Maybe you're wondering whether to call.
Maybe you're trying to decide whether to break the silence.
I don't have the answer for you.
Honestly, I'm still figuring it out for myself.
What I do know is this: relationships can't be carried by one person forever. At some point, both people have to choose the relationship. And if you've spent your entire life being the one who does the choosing, maybe it's okay to put the weight down for a while and see what happens.
That's what I'm doing.
Not because I don't care.
Not because I don't miss her.
Not because the relationship didn't matter.
But because for the first time in a very long time, I'm learning that loving someone doesn't require me to do all the work.
And maybe that's the lesson hidden inside the silence.
Maybe the lesson isn't whether I should reach out.
Maybe the lesson is learning that my value isn't measured by how many relationships I can save.
Maybe the lesson is finally understanding that peace and people-pleasing are not the same thing.
And maybe, just maybe, letting it stay broken for now is the healthiest thing I've ever done.
— Tj 🩷